Wednesday, May 6, 2020
Discuss how Hare presents ideas about class in this scene and at least one other point in the play Free Essays
Within Hareââ¬â¢s play Murmuring Judges, there almost appears to be two class systems. The first is the standard upper, middle and lower, however, Hare almost separates the prisoners, the police and the lawyers as three separate classes of people, who each look down on the class below them. This allows us to see not only the perceived separations of social classes but also the classes that you are put into according to you profession and the classist attitudes held by those above. We will write a custom essay sample on Discuss how Hare presents ideas about class in this scene and at least one other point in the play or any similar topic only for you Order Now In the focus scene, Hare clearly shows his views about class through implications and connotations used in the lawyers and judges conversations. Immediately as the scene starts, ââ¬Å"His Excellency AL Hadji Sulay Ibrahim Dunkoâ⬠is announced by the toast master. Whereas within the perceived lower class of the police, DC Abdul Khan is referred to as Jimmy, here he is announced with his full name and title, which immediately suggests a difference in class and status between the two men. This is also clearly shown in the language used by all the characters in this scene, as phrases such as ââ¬Å"Grand Daysâ⬠and ââ¬Å"the fishy stuffâ⬠in reference to caviar creates a semantic field which suggests the men view themselves and believe they are viewed by others as upper class. Furthermore, the juxtaposition of the Toast Master and Gerard at the opening of Act 2 clearly demonstrates the social classes, as we see the announcement of important men next to a man monologuing within his prison cell. Hare uses food in the focus scene to reflect the upper class nature of the men. As previously referenced, Cuddeford calls caviar ââ¬Å"the fishy stuffâ⬠, suggesting his familiarity with highly expensive foods, which subtly exposes his class. Again, the ââ¬Å"Roast Venison Baden-Badenâ⬠also shows the dinner to be sophisticated and the suggestion that ââ¬Å"[the students] have to eat their way through twenty four dinnersâ⬠reveals the recklessness of the system in terms of man, which clearly suggests there is money to be thrown around. Hare also uses food in other moments in the play reflect the lower classes of the police and the prisoners. Whereas Gerard is only once offered a cup of tea, Woodyââ¬â¢s line ââ¬Å"your glass of beer? â⬠shows Woody to act ââ¬Å"like a manservantâ⬠which again clearly shows the difference between the two men. However, it could be argued that Sir Peter sees himself as more important than he really is, as he sends Woody to ask Irina to the opera in order to make himself seem too important to come in person, which isnââ¬â¢t reflected anywhere else in the play. Similarly, Hare uses other running motifs throughout the play which suggest the upper class nature of the lawyers, but also to suggest the lawyerââ¬â¢s ideas about the lower classes. The discussion of Desert Island Disks clearly shows them to be at least middle class, as do Sir Peterââ¬â¢s selections, but the comment ââ¬Å"everyone listens to desert island disksâ⬠is what exemplifies how out of touch with reality the lawyers are. This unrealistic idea of society is also shown by Sir Peter, ââ¬Å"I thought all educated young women loved musicâ⬠, as this is rather an idea of the past then the present. Hare uses reading to show the inherent difference between the lawyers and the prisoners especially, as he presents the lawyers as having ââ¬Å"no time to read off the jobâ⬠, whereas Gerard sarcastically states ââ¬Å"Thank God for literatureâ⬠as whilst the lawyers claim to have no time, the cruel irony is that all Gerard has is ââ¬Ëtimeââ¬â¢. The lawyers views on those they perceive to be lower than them is never hidden, possibly as the lawyers are largely untouchable due to their position, as shown by the conversation with the Home Secretary, which shows the lawyers to have acquaintances in the government. Cuddeford openly calls the suspects ââ¬Å"common-as-much individualsâ⬠which shows the upper classes to think themselves much better than everyone else. This is further shown by ââ¬Å"[the prisons] may be called failings of societyâ⬠¦ which are truly not my concernâ⬠show disinterest in the justice of those beneath them, again shown by Sir Peterââ¬â¢s unwillingness to do criminal law as ââ¬Å"it involves real peopleâ⬠. On a larger scale, Sir Peter shows not only the suspects but the whole idea of crime to be ââ¬Å"trivialâ⬠, as he refers to Gerardââ¬â¢s case, which clearly upturns Gerardââ¬â¢s life, as ââ¬Å"a silly sort of warehouse robberyâ⬠. Sir Peter further expresses his view on Gerard later, claiming he is ââ¬Å"an ordinary, sub-average human beingâ⬠, demonstrating the barriers he believes exist between them. Gerard is also presented as aware of these separations, as shown through ââ¬Å"these menâ⬠¦ will go home to wine in fine glasses and the gossip of the barâ⬠¦and I will go to my gaolâ⬠. Gerardââ¬â¢s reference to himself as ââ¬Å"the stuff of their professionâ⬠suggests that Gerard perhaps also sees himself as below the lawyers, which could be used to argue that class separations are inherent. This inference is reinforced by ââ¬Å"there is a glass screen and our clients live on the other side of itâ⬠, which not only suggests a separation but also could be seen as excusing the seemed inability of the legal system to help its clients. Although largely presented as incapable or unwilling to help their clients, the lawyers are clearly shown to cover their own backs. At the time, there was a suggestion of changing laws regarding barristers which would, according to Sir Peter, would be ââ¬Å"a threat to justiceâ⬠. In response to this, Irina, under instruction, starts a campaign against the new legislation which raises ?1million in four days. This is heavily ironic within the play, as it is often states there is no money to reform the prison, which given the events of the Strangeways riot in April 1990, would presumably be a higher priority. It also shows the extent to which the lawyers are upper class, as the blase attitude of ââ¬Å"give or take a few thousandâ⬠shows how small an amount of money this is to them, which would be huge to any other characters in the play. Cuddeford is shown to be clearly aware of this, ââ¬Å"play down the millionâ⬠, which suggests a level of guilt at using the money for this, especially within their profession. In conclusion, Hare uses juxtaposition throughout Murmuring Judges to show the seemingly inherent differences in class between the lawyers and the prisoners in particular. Whilst the prisoners are forced to ââ¬Å"slop outâ⬠and ââ¬Å"throw shit packagesâ⬠, the lawyers are often presented in luxurious settings, ââ¬Å"laid out magnificently four different wine glassesâ⬠. Hare also presents ideas of class mainly from the perspective of the lawyers who seem themselves as more important than they perhaps are, and certainly better than the ââ¬Å"common-as-muckâ⬠ordinaries. Overall, I think the ideas of class in the play are nicely represented in the line ââ¬Å"we were going to abolish this as outdatedâ⬠, but in the end didnââ¬â¢t, which for me shows the lawyers understanding that the system is incapable or unwilling to work to the best of its ability, but simply would rather not out of tradition. How to cite Discuss how Hare presents ideas about class in this scene and at least one other point in the play, Papers
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.